Search and Rescue – Sherp ATV and Argo Hydratrek
This is a comparison between the Sherp ATV and the Argo Hydratrek. There is more to a rescue than just getting there. Getting there in a timely manner, keeping rescue workers from being fatigued in route, having the room to carry the needed equipment and protecting the patient in transport are all important factors. Fleetistics believes there is little benefit to the Argo platform other than price for search and rescue operations.
1. Neither vehicle has suspension but the trailer low tire pressure in the Sherp can be lowered which makes the ride smoother.
2. The Argo uses tracks and propellers. Propellers are very limited in real operations other than a clean lake. They are subject to water debris and almost never used in the demo videos. The paddle wheels on the Sherp never get clogged by water debris.
3. Hydratrek has a Max payload of 2500 lbs, the Sherp 2,000. The Sherp has an amphibious trailer which can transport more hear and supplies.
4. The Hydratrek has 6-8 tires to maintain plus tracks, the Sherp has 4.
5. The Hydratrek max speed is 14/5 mph on land/water vs Sherp at 27/4 mph.
6. The Argo has an open cockpit and no hardcover to provide protection. The Sherp has a hard top and the top can be removed on the pickup version for unique situations. Protection is important for patient care and responder fatigue.
7. The Argo product line cannot be adapted in the field to the conditions or terrain. The Sherp can inflate or deflate the ultra low-pressure tires to match the traction and driving surface needs.
8. The Argo track system is more expensive to maintain than the
9. Any track system is less reliable, there are simply more moving parts and points of failure. If a track breaks in the field, fixing it may be impossible. Tires can be patched to get you home.
10. The seating in the Hydratrek and all Argos is limited. The videos clearly depict the few seats available and the lack of patient space. In an emergency the Sherp can transport 11 people! 2 in front, 3 either side in the area and thee on the rear floor.
11. The Argos angle of attack uphill is about half that of the Sherp at 3′. The lower angle of attack makes is more likely to get stuck exiting a river, over a frozen lake, crossing a log or traversing rocks. View the Argo on ice.
12. The track system is as tough or tougher on the environment for a zero turn. Even traveling straight the large footprint is comparable to the Sherp low-pressure tire.
13. The Hydratrek cost about half that of the Sherp starting at $119,00.
14. Patient care conditions overall are far better in the Sherp. The enclosed back provides seating for rescue workers with a stretcher between them. The shelter keeps the sun, wind, rain, tree limbs and bugs off patients and responders. At -30F getting an IV started in an Argo will be almost impossible since exposed to the elements.
15. The ground clearance of the Argo is much lower than the